17 C
Jaipur
Sunday, November 1, 2020

Qualcomm: US appeals court reverses antitrust ruling against Qualcomm – Latest News

Must read

Best Buy Black Friday Sony WH-1000XM4 deals end tomorrow – hurry for lowest price yet on top headphones

Best Buy's first wave of Black Friday deals must come to an end tomorrow, which means this excellent price on the Sony WH-1000XM4 headphones...

toyota: Toyota to invest $500 million in KDDI to deepen ties for “connected car” – Latest News

Toyota Motor Corp and KDDI Corp said on Friday that Japan's biggest automaker would invest 52.2 billion yen ($500 million) in the mobile carrier...

CDC study says tons of people catch COVID-19 in the one place that’s supposed to be safe – BGR

The CDC published a new coronavirus study that looked at the infection rate inside the household. Researchers found that 102 out of 191 people who...

This $299 laptop is one of the best Black Friday deals we’ve seen yet – but it ends tomorrow

Granted, we're only just getting started in this year's Black Friday laptop deals, but Best Buy's offerings this weekend are looking particularly sharp. One...

A US appeals court reversed a lower court ruling against chip supplier Qualcomm Inc in an antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission.

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals also vacated an injunction that would have required Qualcomm to change its intellectual property licensing practices.

The decision was a major vindication for the San Diego-based company, the largest supplier of chips for mobile phones and a key generator of wireless communications technology.

Qualcomm was fighting a May 2019 decision by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California. Koh sided with the FTC, writing that Qualcomm’s practice of requiring phone makers to sign a patent license agreement before selling them chips “strangled competition” and harmed consumers.

But the appeals court, in a 3-0 ruling written by Circuit Judge Consuelo Callahan, ruled that Qualcomm had no duty to license its patents to rival chip suppliers and that it was not anticompetitive to require phone makers to sign a license agreement.

“Instead, these aspects of Qualcomm’s business model are ‘chip-supplier neutral’ and do not undermine competition in the relevant antitrust markets,” Callahan wrote.

Qualcomm praised the decision while the FTC called it “disappointing.”

“The Court of Appeals unanimous reversal, entirely vacating the District Court decision, validates our business model and patent licensing program and underscores the tremendous contributions that Qualcomm has made to the industry,” Don Rosenberg, Qualcomm’s general counsel, said in statement.

The FTC’s Bureau of Competition director, Ian Conner, said in a statement, that the agency “will be considering our options.”

The case divided U.S. antitrust regulators with the Justice Department intervening to file a brief in support of Qualcomm.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Qualcomm shares rose about 4% on the news. The shares have been up from March lows as the company continued to show growth despite a sluggish smart phone market.

Qualcomm had argued that the FTC decision, if allowed to stand, would upend its business model by requiring it for the first time to license its technology to rival chipmakers and rework many of its patent licensing deals with phone makers.

Qualcomm won a pause in enforcement of the decision while its legal appeal played out and voluntarily changed how it structured some of its licensing deals for 5G technology. With the appeals victory and raft of new agreements signed with customers since the case was decided, Qualcomm is largely clear to resume conducting business as it had for decades before the FTC case.

Qualcomm’s business model often prompted conflict with phone makers, most notably Apple Inc, which supported the FTC’s case and mounted a separate antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm.

The phone makers bristled at Qualcomm’s insistence that manufacturers license its broad patent portfolio regardless of whose chips they chose.

Apple settled its case against Qualcomm in 2018 and signed a license deal and chip supply agreement. Other major phone makers such as Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and Huawei Technologies Co Ltd have also settled disputes with the chip supplier and signed license deals since the FTC case was decided.

Source link

- Advertisement -

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article

Best Buy Black Friday Sony WH-1000XM4 deals end tomorrow – hurry for lowest price yet on top headphones

Best Buy's first wave of Black Friday deals must come to an end tomorrow, which means this excellent price on the Sony WH-1000XM4 headphones...

toyota: Toyota to invest $500 million in KDDI to deepen ties for “connected car” – Latest News

Toyota Motor Corp and KDDI Corp said on Friday that Japan's biggest automaker would invest 52.2 billion yen ($500 million) in the mobile carrier...

CDC study says tons of people catch COVID-19 in the one place that’s supposed to be safe – BGR

The CDC published a new coronavirus study that looked at the infection rate inside the household. Researchers found that 102 out of 191 people who...

This $299 laptop is one of the best Black Friday deals we’ve seen yet – but it ends tomorrow

Granted, we're only just getting started in this year's Black Friday laptop deals, but Best Buy's offerings this weekend are looking particularly sharp. One...

Can the Honor Watch ES smartwatch give a lazy person a six-pack? I found out

Many smartwatches come with a wide range of fitness modes, helping the wearer stay fit and active; however, for all the clever tech in...